Telangana government to approach Supreme Court after High Court halts BC reservation orders. Backward Class leaders accuse the state of mishandling the issue and demand immediate corrective steps.

The Telangana government is preparing to move the Supreme Court after the state High Court put a stay on Government Order (GO) 9, which pertains to enhanced reservations for Backward Classes (BCs). The High Court, citing constitutional limits and failure to meet the "triple test" criteria, also suspended GOs 41 and 42 that sought to expand reservation benefits.

Officials said the government has finalized its decision to file an appeal on Monday and will engage top legal experts, including Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Siddhartha Dave, to argue the case. The court has directed the petitioners to file counters within two weeks and the state to reply within four, with the next hearing slated for December 3.

Meanwhile, the ruling has triggered sharp criticism from BC community leaders, who accused the government of poor handling and legal missteps. RJC Krishna, senior leader of the BC Welfare Association, argued that the administration’s lack of preparation invited judicial intervention. “The way these orders were issued shows disregard for transparency and constitutional safeguards,” he said during a meeting in Khammam.

Other community representatives warned that if the government fails to protect the 42% BC quota, it could face severe political backlash. They alleged that vested interests were attempting to block fair representation for BCs through legal means.

Editorial Insight: The controversy reflects Telangana’s deeper struggle to balance social justice with constitutional compliance. Experts believe that unless the state strengthens its legal groundwork and consults constitutional experts before issuing such orders, similar setbacks will recur. For now, all eyes are on how the Supreme Court responds to the upcoming appeal — a decision that could reshape the state’s reservation framework.