West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee appeared in the Supreme Court to challenge the Election Commission’s voter roll revision, alleging wrongful deletions and hardship to genuine voters.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on February 4 personally presented her case before the Supreme Court of India, challenging the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state.

Arguing against the Election Commission of India, Banerjee claimed the revision exercise was leading to the deletion of legitimate voters and was disproportionately impacting opposition-ruled states ahead of Assembly elections. She flagged difficulties faced by migrant workers, senior citizens and low-income families, questioning why such an extensive revision was being undertaken now after a long gap.

The Chief Minister also raised concerns over what she described as selective implementation and alleged that procedural rigidity had caused severe distress among voters. The Supreme Court bench issued notice to the Election Commission, seeking its response next week, while urging authorities to handle discrepancies with care. However, the court did not grant an immediate stay on the ongoing process.

Political reactions were swift and divided. Supporters hailed Banerjee’s direct intervention as a defence of voter rights, while critics dismissed the courtroom appearance as political theatrics.

Analysis: By arguing the case herself, Banerjee has turned a legal challenge into a broader political statement on voter inclusion. The court’s eventual ruling could have implications beyond West Bengal, shaping how future voter roll revisions are conducted in election-bound states. This assessment reflects analytical opinion; all factual details above are drawn from the original content.